开发者

Methods of limiting emulated cpu speed

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-03-17 09:43 出处:网络
I\'m writing a MOS 6502 processor emulator as part of a larger project I\'ve undertaken in my spare time. The emulator is written in Java, and before you say it, I know its not going to be as efficien

I'm writing a MOS 6502 processor emulator as part of a larger project I've undertaken in my spare time. The emulator is written in Java, and before you say it, I know its not going to be as efficient and optimized as if it was written in c or assembly, but the goal is to make it run on various platforms and its pulling 2.5MHZ on a 1GHZ processor which is pretty good for an interpreted emulator. My problem is quite to the contrary, I need to limit t开发者_StackOverflowhe number of cycles to 1MHZ. Ive looked around but not seen many strategies for doing this. Ive tried a few things including checking the time after a number of cycles and sleeping for the difference between the expected time and the actual time elapsed, but checking the time slows down the emulation by a factor of 8 so does anyone have any better suggestions or perhaps ways to optimize time polling in java to reduce the slowdown?


The problem with using sleep() is that you generally only get a granularity of 1ms, and the actual sleep that you will get isn't necessarily even accurate to the nearest 1ms as it depends on what the rest of the system is doing. A couple of suggestions to try (off the top of my head-- I've not actually written a CPU emulator in Java):

  • stick to your idea, but check the time between a large-ish number of emulated instructions (execution is going to be a bit "lumpy" anyway especially on a uniprocessor machine, because the OS can potentially take away the CPU from your thread for several milliseconds at a time);

  • as you want to execute in the order of 1000 emulated instructions per millisecond, you could also try just hanging on to the CPU between "instructions": have your program periodically work out by trial and error how many runs through a loop it needs to go between instructions to "waste" enough CPU to make the timing work out at 1 million emulated instructions / sec on average (you may want to see if setting your thread to low priority helps system performance in this case).


I would use System.nanoTime() in a busy wait as @pst suggested earlier.

You can speed up the emulation by generating byte code. Most instructions should translate quite well and you can add a busy wait call so each instruction takes the amount of time the original instruction would have done. You have an option to increase the delay so you can watch each instruction being executed.

To make it really cool you could generate 6502 assembly code as text with matching line numbers in the byte code. This would allow you to use the debugger to step through the code, breakpoint it and see what the application is doing. ;)

A simple way to emulate the memory is to use direct ByteBuffer or native memory with the Unsafe class to access it. This will give you a block of memory you can access as any data type in any order.


You might be interested in examining the Java Apple Computer Emulator (JACE), which incorporates 6502 emulation. It uses Thread.sleep() in its TimedDevice class.


Have you looked into creating a Timer object that goes off at the cycle length you need it? You could have the timer itself initiate the next loop.

Here is the documentation for the Java 6 version: http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Timer.html

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号