Is FluorineFX mature enough to use for a large web application?

I am in the planning stages of developing a large web application written in Flex and was wondering if anyone has actually used FluorineFX in a large production e开发者_JAVA百科nvironment?

The documentation and online community makes it seem like it could be abandoned in the years to come and I have yet to read about it being used in production.

I have been assessing Weborb as well, but the costs are extremely high and I'm not entirely satisfied with the general workflow/setup of it. Are there any other solutions out there that I should consider?

---

I've used FlourineFx with great success in a large product with a Flex 3 client, and it actually works better than the ColdFusion (Adobe LiveCycle) product it replaced. It does require some configuration to work correctly, but it seems to work quite well once your config files are set up -- then again, its the same config files that Adobe LiveCycle need.

---

Not sure about FlourineFX. It looks like it is either just getting started or ending.

Working with DotNet and Flex, I would recommend writing the Flex Client and using ASP.NET web services to communicate. Microsoft ASP.NET MVC is a wonderful framework that is free and well supported. See: http://www.asp.net/mvc

The advantage of using a web service is that the client can change so that if you decide against Flex in the future or decide to use a Mobile Client then the service will remain the same. Plus, ASP.NET MVC has been proven on some very large sites like SO here.

Hope this helps.