开发者

lua meta-object protocol model: lua-coat vs loose

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-03-04 07:30 出处:网络
There is someone who uses lua-coat or loose routinely? Which is more 开发者_开发问答mature, stable, bugfree -> \"better\"?

There is someone who uses lua-coat or loose routinely?

Which is more 开发者_开发问答mature, stable, bugfree -> "better"?

Is one of them enough mature for the production environment?

  • lua-coat - activity none - last updated Nov.2010 - marked as beta
  • loose - activity none - last updated in Dec.2008 - ???

Any experience?

(looking for an answer from someone who has real experience with them :)


Disclaimer: I have no direct experience with any of those libraries, but I've got some experience creating my own OOP lib.

Of the two libraries you have proposed, lua-coat seems better. My two main reasons:

  • It's got some fairly recent commits
  • It's got automated tests. IMHO Any serious lib should have them(*), but it's specially important in OOP libs; keeping track of all the things that can go wrong in a refactoring is just impossible without automated testing.

(*) My lib also has tests, mind you. They are just on a different repo, for now.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消