Is there any shorthand for the JavaScript document.getElementById? Or is there any way I can define o开发者_运维技巧ne? It gets repetitive retyping that over and over.
var $ = function( id ) { return document.getElementById( id ); };
$( 'someID' )
Here I used $, but you can use any valid variable name.
var byId = function( id ) { return document.getElementById( id ); };
byId( 'someID' )
To save an extra character you could pollute the String prototype like this:
pollutePrototype(String, '绎', {
    configurable: false, // others must fail
    get: function() {
        return document.getElementById(this);
    },
    set: function(element) {
        element.id = this;
    }
});
function pollutePrototype(buildIn, name, descr) {
    var oldDescr = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(buildIn.prototype, name);
    if (oldDescr && !oldDescr.configurable) {
        console.error('Unable to replace ' + buildIn.name + '.prototype.' + name + '!');
    } else {
        if (oldDescr) {
            console.warn('Replacing ' + buildIn.name + '.prototype.' + name + ' might cause unexpected behaviour.');
        }
        Object.defineProperty(buildIn.prototype, name, descr);
    }
}
It works in some browsers and you can access elements this way:
document.body.appendChild(
    'footer'.绎 = document.createElement('div')
);
'footer'.绎.textContent = 'btw nice browser :)';
I have chosen the name of the property almost randomly. If you actually wanted to use this shorthand I would suggest coming up with something easier to type.
You can easily create shorthand easily yourself:
function getE(id){
   return document.getElementById(id);
}
id's are saved to the window.
HTML
 <div id='logo'>logo</div>
JS
logo.innerHTML;
is the same as writing:
document.getElementById( 'logo' ).innerHtml;
I don't suggest using the former method as it is not common practice.
A quick alternative to contribute:
HTMLDocument.prototype.e = document.getElementById
Then just do:
document.e('id');
There's a catch, it doesn't work in browsers that don't let you extend prototypes (e.g. IE6).
(Shorthand for not only getting element by ID, but also getting element by class :P)
I use something like
function _(s){
    if(s.charAt(0)=='#')return [document.getElementById(s.slice(1))];
    else if(s.charAt(0)=='.'){
        var b=[],a=document.getElementsByTagName("*");
        for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)if(a[i].className.split(' ').indexOf(s.slice(1))>=0)b.push(a[i]);
        return b;
    }
}
Usage : _(".test") returns all elements with class name test, and _("#blah") returns an element with id blah.
<script>
var _ = function(eId)
{
    return getElementById(eId);
}
</script>
<script>
var myDiv = _('id');
</script>
There are several good answers here and several are dancing around jQuery-like syntax, but not one mentions actually using jQuery. If you're not against trying it, check out jQuery. It let's you select elements super easy like this..
By ID:
$('#elementId')
By CSS class:
$('.className')
By element type:
$('a')  // all anchors on page 
$('inputs')  // all inputs on page 
$('p a')  // all anchors within paragaphs on page 
There's none built-in.
If you don't mind polluting the global namespace, why not:
function $e(id) {
    return document.getElementById(id);
}
EDIT - I changed the function name to be something unusual, but short and not otherwise clashing with jQuery or anything else that uses a bare $ sign.
I frequently use:
var byId='getElementById'
var byClass='getElementsByClass'
var byTag='getElementsByTag'
var mydiv=document[byId]('div') 
/* as document["getElementById"] === document.getElementById */
I think it's better than a external function (e.g. $() or byId()) because you can do things like this:
var link=document[byId]('list')[byClass]('li')[0][byTag]('a')[0]
Btw, don't use jQuery for this, jQuery is much, much slower than document.getElementById(), an external function like $() or byId(), or my method:  http://jsperf.com/document-getelementbyid-vs-jquery/5
Yes, it gets repetitive to use the same function over and over each time with a different argument:
var myImage = document.getElementById("myImage");
var myDiv = document.getElementById("myDiv");
So a nice thing would be a function that takes all those arguments at the same time:
function getElementsByIds(/* id1, id2, id3, ... */) {
    var elements = {};
    for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
        elements[arguments[i]] = document.getElementById(arguments[i]);
    }
    return elements;
}
Then you would have references to all your elements stored in one object:
var el = getElementsByIds("myImage", "myDiv");
el.myImage.src = "test.gif";
But you would still have to list all those ids.
You could simplify it even more if you want all elements with ids:
function getElementsWithIds() {
    var elements = {};
    var elementList = document.querySelectorAll("[id]");
    for (var i = 0; i < elementList.length; i++) {
        elements[elementList[i].id] = elementList[i];
    }
    return elements;
}
But it would be pretty expensive to call this function if you have many elements.
So, theoretically, if you would use the with keyword you could write code like this:
with (getElementsByIds('myButton', 'myImage', 'myTextbox')) {
    myButton.onclick = function() {
        myImage.src = myTextbox.value;
    };
}
But I don't want to promote the use of with. Probably there's a better way to do it.
Well, you could create a shorthand function, that's what I do.
function $(element) {
    return document.getElementById(element);
}
and then when you wanted to get it, you just do
$('yourid')
Also, another useful trick that I found, is that if you want to get the value or innerHTML of an item ID, you can make functions like this:
function $val(el) {
    return $(el).value;
}
function $inner(el) {
    return $(el).innerHTML;
}
Hope you like it!
I actually made a kind of mini javascript library based on this whole idea. Here it is.
If this is on your own site, consider using a library like jQuery to give you this and many other useful shorthands that also abstract away browser differences. Personally, if I wrote enough code to be bothered by the longhand, I would include jQuery.
In jQuery, the syntax would be $("#someid"). If you then want the actual DOM element and not the jQuery wrapper, it's $("#someid")[0], but you could most likely do whatever you're after with the jQuery wrapper.
Or, if you're using this in a browser developer console, research their built-in utilities. As someone else mentioned, the Chrome JavaScript console includes a $("someid") method, and you can also click an element in the developer tools "Elements" view and then reference it with $0 from the console. The previously selected element becomes $1 and so on.
If the only issue here is typing, maybe you should just get yourself a JavaScript editor with intellisense.
If the purpose is to get shorter code, then you could consider a JavaScript library like jQuery, or you can just write your own shorthand functions, like:
function byId(string) {return document.getElementById(string);}
I used to do the above for better performance. What I learnt last year is that with compression techniques the server does it automatically for you, so my shortening technique was actually making my code heavier. Now I am just happy with typing the whole document.getElementById.
If you are asking for a shorthand function...
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
The content of the body element is displayed in your browser.
<div id="d1">DIV</div>
<script>
var d=document;
d.g=document.getElementById;
d.g("d1").innerHTML = "catch";
</script>
</body>
</html>
or
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
The content of the body element is displayed in your browser.
<div id="d1">DIV</div>
<script>
var w=window;
w["d1"].innerHTML = "catch2";
</script>
</body>
Arrow functions make is shorter.
var $id = (id) => document.getElementById(id);
wrap the document.querySelectorAll ... a jquery like select
function $(selector){
   var s = document.querySelectorAll(selector); 
   return s.length > 1 ? s : s[0];
}
// usage: $('$myId')
Well, if the id of the element does not compete with any properties of the global object, you don't have to use any function.
myDiv.appendChild(document.createTextNode("Once I was myDiv. "));
myDiv.id = "yourDiv";
yourDiv.appendChild(document.createTextNode("But now I'm yourDiv."));
edit: But you don't want to make use of this 'feature'.
Another wrapper:
const IDS = new Proxy({}, { 
    get: function(target, id) {
        return document.getElementById(id); } });
IDS.camelCaseId.style.color = 'red';
IDS['dash-id'].style.color = 'blue';<div id="camelCaseId">div 1</div>
<div id="dash-id">div 2</div>This, in case you don't want to use the unthinkable, see above.
You can use a wrapper function like :
const byId = (id) => document.getElementById(id);
Or
Assign document.getElementById  to a variable by binding it with document object.
const byId = document.getElementById.bind(document);
Note: In second approach, If you don't bind document.getElementById with document you'll get error :
Uncaught TypeError: Illegal invocation
What Function.bind does is it creates a new function with its this keyword set to value that you provide as argument to Function.bind.
Read docs for Function.bind
const $id = id => document.getElementById(id);
...
$id('header')
I just use: function id(id) {return document.getElementById(id);}", called by id(target id).action; It works for me in Chrome, Edge & Firefox, though not in Safari or Opera.
I wrote this yesterday and found it quite useful.
function gid(id, attribute) {
    var x = 'document.getElementById("'+id+'")';
    if(attribute) x += '.'+attribute;
    eval('x =' + x);
    return x;
}
This is how you use it.
// Get element by ID
   var node = gid('someID'); //returns <p id='someID' class='style'>Hello World</p>
// returns 'Hello World'
// var getText = document.GetElementById('someID').innerText; 
   var getText = gid('someID', 'innerText'); 
// Get parent node
   var parentNode = gid('someID', 'parentNode');
 
         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                        ![Interactive visualization of a graph in python [closed]](https://www.devze.com/res/2023/04-10/09/92d32fe8c0d22fb96bd6f6e8b7d1f457.gif) 
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         加载中,请稍侯......
 加载中,请稍侯......
      
精彩评论