开发者

Interpolate NA values in a data frame with na.approx

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-04-02 11:57 出处:网络
I am trying to remove NAs 开发者_运维百科from my data frame by interpolation with na.approx() but can\'t remove all of the NAs.

I am trying to remove NAs 开发者_运维百科from my data frame by interpolation with na.approx() but can't remove all of the NAs.

My data frame is a 4096x4096 with 270.15 as flag for non valid value. I need data to be continous in all points to feed a meteorological model. Yesterday I asked, and obtained an answer, on how to replace values in a data frame based in another data frame. But after that I came to na.approx() and then decided to replace the 270.15 values with NA and try na.approx() to interpolate data. But the question is why na.approx() does not replace all NAs.

This is what I am doing:

  • Read the original hdf file with hdf5load
  • Subset the data frame (4094x4096)
  • Substitute flag value with NA

    > sst4[sst4 == 270.15 ] = NA
    
  • Check first column (or any other)

    > summary(sst4[,1])
    
    Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.    NA's
    271.3   276.4   285.9   285.5   292.3   302.8  1345.0
    
  • Run na.approx

    > sst4=na.approx(sst4,na.rm="FALSE")
    
  • Check first column

    > summary(sst4[,1]) 
    Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max.    NA's
    271.3   276.5   286.3   285.9   292.6   302.8   411.0
    

As you can see 411 NA's have not been removed. Why? Do they all correspond to leading/ending column values?

head(sst4[,1])
[1] NA NA NA NA NA NA
tail(sst4[,1])
[1] NA NA NA NA NA NA

Is it needed by na.approx to have valid values before and after NA to interpolate? Do I need to set any other na.approx option?

Thank you very much


A small, reproducible example:

library(zoo)
set.seed(1)
m <- matrix(runif(16, 0, 100), nrow = 4)
missing_values <- sample(16, 7)
m[missing_values] <- NA
m
         [,1]     [,2]      [,3]     [,4]
[1,] 26.55087 20.16819 62.911404 68.70228
[2,] 37.21239       NA  6.178627 38.41037
[3,]       NA       NA        NA       NA
[4,] 90.82078 66.07978        NA       NA

na.approx(m)
         [,1]     [,2]      [,3]     [,4]
[1,] 26.55087 20.16819 62.911404 68.70228
[2,] 37.21239 35.47206  6.178627 38.41037
[3,] 64.01658 50.77592        NA       NA
[4,] 90.82078 66.07978        NA       NA

m[4, 4] <- 50
na.approx(m)
         [,1]     [,2]      [,3]     [,4]
[1,] 26.55087 20.16819 62.911404 68.70228
[2,] 37.21239 35.47206  6.178627 38.41037
[3,] 64.01658 50.77592        NA 44.20519
[4,] 90.82078 66.07978        NA 50.00000

Yup, looks like you do need the start/end values of columns to be known or the interpolation doesn't work. Can you guess values for your boundaries?

ANOTHER EDIT: So by default, you need the start and end values of columns to be known. However it is possible to get na.approx to always fill in the blanks by passing rule = 2. See Felix's answer. You can also use na.fill to provide a default value, as per Gabor's comment. Finally, you can interpolate boundary conditions in two directions (see below) or guess boundary conditions.


EDIT: A further thought. Since na.approx is only interpolating in columns, and your data is spacial, perhaps interpolating in rows would be useful too. Then you could take the average.

na.approx fails when whole columns are NA, so we create a bigger dataset.

set.seed(1)
m <- matrix(runif(64, 0, 100), nrow = 8)
missing_values <- sample(64, 15)
m[missing_values] <- NA

Run na.approx both ways.

by_col <- na.approx(m)
by_row <- t(na.approx(t(m)))

Find out the best guess.

default <- 50
best_guess <- ifelse(is.na(by_row), 
  ifelse(
    is.na(by_col), 
    default,              #neither known
    by_col                #only by_col known
  ), 
  ifelse(
    is.na(by_col), 
    by_row,               #only by_row known
    (by_row + by_col) / 2 #both known
  )
)


na.approx() follows the approx() function in only interpolating values, not extrapolating them, by default. However, as described in the help page for approx(), you can specify rule = 2 to extrapolate as a constant value of the nearest extreme. Following on from Richie Cotton's example:

na.approx(m, rule = 2)
         [,1]     [,2]      [,3]     [,4]
[1,] 26.55087 20.16819 62.911404 68.70228
[2,] 37.21239 35.47206  6.178627 38.41037
[3,] 64.01658 50.77592  6.178627 38.41037
[4,] 90.82078 66.07978  6.178627 38.41037

Equivalently, you can use "last observation carry forward" explicitly.

na.locf(na.approx(m))
## "first observation carry backwards" too:
na.locf(na.locf(na.approx(m)), fromLast = TRUE)


I think you should try to set na.rm=TRUE

From the docs

na.rm logical. Should leading NAs be removed?

http://www.oga-lab.net/RGM2/func.php?rd_id=zoo:na.approx

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号