开发者

Big Omega Notation. Am I doing this right?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-04-07 02:13 出处:网络
If I have some algorithm that runs at best n time and at worst n^2 time, is it fair to say that the algorithm is Big Omega (n)?

If I have some algorithm that runs at best n time and at worst n^2 time, is it fair to say that the algorithm is Big Omega (n)?

Does this mean that the algorithm will run at least n (time)? I am just not sure if I have the right 开发者_Python百科idea here.

Thanks.


For Big Oh, you will state the worst time as the time it takes, in your case O(n^2). For Big Omega, you state the smallest time, in this case f(n).

Also see this guide to Big O and this discussion of Big O and Big Omega.


Yes. If the runtime f(n) is asymptotically bounded below by g(n) = n, then f(n) is BigOmega(n).

Edit: Most of the time, algorithms are analyzed in terms of their worst-case behavior -- which corresponds to "Big O" notation. In your case, the runtime is O(n^2).

But for those rare occasions when you need to talk about a lower bound, or best case behavior, "Big Omega" notation is used. And in your case, the runtime is at least n, so it is correct to describe it as BigOmega(n).

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号