开发者

High performance "contains" search in list of strings in C#

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-04-09 15:19 出处:网络
I have a list of approx. 500,000 strings, each approx. 100 characters long. Given a search term, I want to identify all strings in the list that contain the search term. At the moment Iam doing this w

I have a list of approx. 500,000 strings, each approx. 100 characters long. Given a search term, I want to identify all strings in the list that contain the search term. At the moment I am doing this with a plain old dataset using the Select method ("MATCH %term%"). This takes about 600ms on my laptop. I'd like to make it faster, maybe 100-200ms.

What would be a recommended approach?

Performance is critical so I can trade memory footpri开发者_运维技巧nt for better performance if necessary (within reason). The list of strings will not change once initialised so calculating hashes would also be an option.

Does anyone have a recommendation and which C# data structures are best suited to the task?


I've heard good things about Lucene.NET when it comes to performing quick full-text searches. They've done the work to figure out the fastest data structures and such to use. I'd suggest giving that a shot.

Otherwise, you might just try something like this:

var matches = list.AsParallel().Where(s => s.Contains(searchTerm)).ToList();

But it probably won't get you down to 100ms.


Have you tried the following?

list.FindAll(x => x.Contains("YourTerm")).ToList();

For some reason the List.AsParallel().Where(...) is slower than list.FindAll(...) on my PC.

list.AsParallel().Where(x => x.Contains("YourTerm")).ToList();

Hope this will help you.


A trie or suffix tree would help in making this faster - this is essentially what fulltext search (usually) is using.

There are implementations in C# you can use, also see this SO thread: Looking for the suffix tree implementation in C#?

Also as mentioned by @leppie parallel execution will likely be already provide you with the x3 performance gain you are looking for. But then again you will have to measure closely, without that it's anyone's guess.


Have you tried loading your strings into a List<string> and then using the Linq extensions Contains method?

var myList = new List<string>();
//Code to load your list goes here...

var searchTerm = "find this";
var match = myList.Contains(searchTerm);


public static bool ContainsFast<T>(this IList<T> list, T item)
{
    return list.IndexOf(item) >= 0;
}

Base on tests that I did, this variation of Contains was about 33% faster on my side.


According to these benchmarks, the fastest way to check if a string occurs in a string is the following:

for (int x = 0; x < ss.Length; x++)
    for (int y = 0; y < sf.Length; y++
        c[y] += ((ss[x].Length - ss[x].Replace(sf[y], String.Empty).Length) / sf[y].Length > 0 ? 1 : 0);

Thus, you could:

  1. Loop through the list using a Parallel.For construct
  2. Implement the code above to check if a string contains what you're looking for. "SS" is the string[] of strings to search; "SF" is the string[] of strings to search for; c[y] is the total count of each one found.

Obviously you'd have to adapt them to your List[string] (or whatever data structure you're using).

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号