开发者

C++ Linked list implementation crashing

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-04-11 16:16 出处:网络
I am trying to implement a linked list for a data structures class and I am having some difficulty with the searching portion of the algorithm.

I am trying to implement a linked list for a data structures class and I am having some difficulty with the searching portion of the algorithm.

Below is the offending code, which I have tried to implement following the pseudo-code in the MIT introduction to algorithms text:

//
// Method searches and retrieves a specified node from the list
//
Node* List::getNode(unsigned position)
{
    Node* current = m_listHead;

    for(unsigned i = m_listSize-1; (current != 0) && (i != position); --i)
            current = current->next;

    return current;
}

The head at this point in the program is the 4th node, which contains the value of int 5. the problem appears to be in the body of the for-loop, where the pointer to the node object is assigned to the n开发者_运维知识库ext node. But this is going beyond the head of the node, so it is essentially pointing at some random location in memory (this makes sense).

Shouldn't the algorithm be moving to the previous Node instead of the next Node in this case? Below is the pseudo-code:

LIST-SEARCH(L, k)
    x <- head
    while x != NIL and key != k
        do x <- next[x]
    return x

Also, here is the header file for my Linked list implementation. I haven't tried to implement it in Template form yet just to keep things simple:

#ifndef linkList_H
#define linkList_h


//
// Create an object to represent a Node in the linked list object
// (For now, the objects to be put in the list will be integers)
//
struct Node
{
    // nodes of list will be integers
    int number;
    // pointer to the next node in the linked list
    Node* next;
};


//
// Create an object to keep track of all parts in the list
//
class List
{
public:

    // Contstructor intializes all member data
    List() : m_listSize(0), m_listHead(0) {}

    // methods to return size of list and list head
    Node* getListHead() const { return m_listHead; }
    unsigned getListSize() const { return m_listSize; }

    // method for adding a new node to the linked list, 
    // retrieving and deleting a specified node in the list
    void addNode(Node* newNode);
    Node* getNode(unsigned position);

private:

    // member data consists of an unsigned integer representing
    // the list size and a pointer to a Node object representing head
    Node* m_listHead;
    unsigned m_listSize;
};

#endif

Implementation of addNode method:

//
// Method adds a new node to the linked list
//
void List::addNode(Node* newNode)
{
    Node* theNode = new Node;

    theNode = newNode;
    theNode->next;
    m_listHead = theNode;

    ++m_listSize;
}


Try this to construct the list:

void List::addNode(int number) 
{ 
    newNode = new Node;
    newNode -> number = number;
    newNode -> next = m_listHead ;
    m_listHead = newNode;
    ++m_listSize; 
} 

It will add nodes to the head. Perhaps you may wish to store the pointer to the tail and insert the nodes there.


Unfortunately your code doesn't resemble the pseudo code you supply.

The pseudo-code is for searching a linked-list for a key, not a position.

The pseudo code reads as:

Assign head to (node) x.
while x isn't null and the key inside the current node (x) doesn't match k
  assign x->next to x
return x

The returned value is either a pointer to the node that contains k or null

If you're trying to find the node at a given position your loop would be (note this is assuming you're going to use a zero-based index for accessing the list):

Assign head to (node) x
assign 0 to (int) pos
while x isn't null and pos not equal to given position
    assign x->next to x
    increment pos
return x

The result will either be a pointer to the node at the given position or null (if you hit the end of the list first)

Edit: Your code is very close to the latter if that's what you're trying to do ... can you see the difference?

Edit because I like homework where the OP asks the right questions :)

Node* List::getNodeContaining(int searchValue)
{
    Node* current = m_listHead;

    while (current != 0 && current->number != searchValue)
    {
        current = current->next;
    }
    return current;
}

Node* List::getNodeAtPos(int position)
{
     Node* current = m_listHead;
     int pos = 0;

     while (current != 0 && pos != position)
     {
        current = current->next;
        pos++;
     }

     return current;
}


You list is very different from what a normal list ADT looks like. Rather than returning nodes, which would require the client know about the list implementation, you return and accept the type you're making a list of.

In this case you're making a list of integers, sou you'd want

public:
    void add(int num); //prepends an Item to the list
    int get(int pos);

The implementations of both are simple. Add makes a new node, and links it in;

void List::add(int num)
{
    Node *newNode = new Node;
    newNode->number  = num;
    newNode->next = m_listHead;
    m_listHead = newNode;
    m_listSize++;
}

Then get is easy too:

int List::get(int pos)
{
    if(pos>m_listSize)
        ;//throw an error somehow
    Node *tmp = m_listHead;
    while(pos-->0)
        tmp=tmp->next; 
    return m->number
}
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号