I have two classes, Foo<T> and Bar<T>, derived from Base. Each overrides a method virtual Base* convert(ID) const, where ID is an instance of a type that uniquely identifies a particular instantiation of Foo or Bar (pretend it's an enum). The p开发者_如何转开发roblem is that Foo::convert() needs to be able to return a Bar instance, and likewise Bar::convert() needs to be able to instantiate Foo. Since they're both templates, this results in a circular dependency between Foo.h and Bar.h. How do I resolve this?
Edit: A forward declaration does not work because the implementation of each method needs the constructor of the other class:
Foo.h:
#include <Base.h>
template<class T> class Bar;
template<class T>
class Foo : public Base { ... };
template<class T>
Base* Foo<T>::convert(ID id) const {
    if (id == BAR_INT)
        return new Bar<int>(value); // Error.
    ...
}
Bar.h:
#include <Base.h>
template<class T> class Foo;
template<class T>
class Bar : public Base { ... };
template<class T>
Base* Bar<T>::convert(ID id) const {
    if (id == FOO_FLOAT)
        return new Foo<float>(value); // Error.
    ...
}
The error is, naturally, "invalid use of incomplete type".
What you need to do is seperate the class declarations from the implementation. So something like
template <class T> class Foo : public Base
{
    public:
    Base* convert(ID) const;
}
template <class T> class Bar : public Base
{
    public:
    Base* convert(ID) const;
}
template <class T> Base* Foo<T>::convert(ID) const {return new Bar<T>;}
template <class T> Base* Bar<T>::convert(ID) const {return new Foo<T>;}
This way, you have complete class definitions when the functions are defined.
(Updated) You should be able to handle that the same as with non-template classes. Write your Bar.h like this. (And similarly for Foo.h)
#if !defined(BAR_H_INCLUDED)
#define BAR_H_INCLUDED
template <class T>
class Foo;
template <class T>
class Bar
{
    /// Declarations, no implementations.
}    
#include "Foo.h"
template <class T>
Base* Bar<T>::Convert() {  /* implementation here... */ }
#endif
You should use template class forward declarations in either headers
template <class T>
class X;
is perfectly good template class forward declaration.
James Curran's answer is a godsend. Generally speaking, James' idea is to restrict inclusion of required header files until the moment the members(' declarations) coming from included header files are needed. As an example:
t1.hh
#ifndef S_SIGNATURE
#define S_SIGNATURE
struct G; // forward declaration
template<typename T>
struct S {
  void s_method(G &);
};
#include "t2.hh" // now we only need G's member declarations
template<typename T>
void S<T>::s_method(G&g) { g.g_method(*this); }
#endif
t2.hh
#ifndef G_SIGNATURE
#define G_SIGNATURE
template<typename T>
struct S; // forward declaration
struct G {
  template<typename T>
  void g_method(S<T>&);
};
#include "t1.hh" // now we only need S' member declarations
template<typename T>
void G::g_method(S<T>& s) { s.s_method(*this); }
#endif
t.cc
#include "t1.hh"
#include "t2.hh"
S<int> s;
G g;
int main(int argc,char**argv) {
  g.g_method(s); // instantiation of G::g_method<int>(S<int>&)
}
 
         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                        ![Interactive visualization of a graph in python [closed]](https://www.devze.com/res/2023/04-10/09/92d32fe8c0d22fb96bd6f6e8b7d1f457.gif) 
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         加载中,请稍侯......
 加载中,请稍侯......
      
精彩评论