class class_name instance;
class开发者_如何学JAVA_name instance;
The above all work with cl.exe, but is it standard,is it the same with all other compilers?
class class_name instance; is allowed by the elaborated-type-specifier nonterminal in the C++ grammar. It's hard to point to a particular section of the standard that tells you this, since even in the appendix that gives the C++ grammar it's rather spread out, but the production basically goes (with many steps elided):
declaration-statement
-> type-specifier declarator ;
-> elaborated-type-specifier declarator ;
-> class identifier declarator ;
-> class identifier unqualified-id ;
-> class class_name instance ;
class_name instance ;, in comparison, is produced using the simple-type-specifier non-terminal.
declaration-statement
-> type-specifier declarator ;
-> simple-type-specifier declarator ;
-> type-name unqualified-id ;
-> class_name instance ;
Yes, It's standard and means the same thing. class T and T mean the same thing in C++. The syntax comes from C where struct T and T don't mean the same thing.
加载中,请稍侯......
精彩评论