I know how to use Unix semaphores in C. Before using them I must call a constructor-ish function named sem_init and after using them I have to call a destructor-like function named sem_destroy.
I know I can keep doing this in C++ because of its backwards compatibility with C, but does C++ have开发者_开发百科 a real object-oriented way to use semaphores?
If you really insist on using POSIX semaphores and not Boost, you can of course wrap sem_t in a class:
class Semaphore {
    sem_t sem;
  public:
    Semaphore(int shared, unsigned value)
    { sem_init(&sem, shared, value); }
    ~Semaphore() { sem_destroy(&sem); }
    int wait() { return sem_wait(&sem); }
    int try_wait() { return sem_trywait(&sem); }
    int unlock() { return sem_post(&sem); }
};
Exercise for the reader: You may want to add exceptions instead of C-style error codes and perhaps other features. Also, this class should be noncopyable. The easiest way to achieve that is inheriting from boost::noncopyable ;)
Edit: as @Ringding remarks, looping on EINTR would be a very wise thing to do.
int Semaphore::wait()
{
    int r;
    do {
        r = sem_wait(&sem);
    } while (r == -1 && errno == EINTR);
    return r;
}
You should use the Boost libraries (if you don't know them, they are for C++ what the JDK is for Java).
Boost.Interprocess is the library you need for your question. It provides an abstraction over the inter-process communnication mechanisms.
This is an example of how to use semaphores.
C++0x has no semaphores? How to synchronize threads?
 
         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                        ![Interactive visualization of a graph in python [closed]](https://www.devze.com/res/2023/04-10/09/92d32fe8c0d22fb96bd6f6e8b7d1f457.gif) 
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         加载中,请稍侯......
 加载中,请稍侯......
      
精彩评论